Sciencegeek Fundamentals #1: An Introduction to the Scientific Method, by way of Chewbacca
by David Ng
A TANGENTIAL SCIENTIFIC METHOD:
ON THE NATURE OF SCIENCE WITH REFERENCES TO CHEWBACCA, STORK EATING ALIENS, A FEW STEVES, ONE INSTANCE OF THE WORD “FUCK,” AND (QUITE POSSIBLY) TWO VERY LARGE CHILDREN.
By DAVID NG
(Fancy pdf of this piece in its entirety also available here)
For the last couple of years, when I’m speaking or lecturing to a larger audience, I would sometimes throw out the following question: “Who is Chewbacca?”
I do this because I’m curious on whether there are actually people in this world who have never heard of Chewbacca. Which, as a big fan of Star Wars, is a possibility that escapes me. Still, without fail, there are always a few. In fact, if I were to plot graphs around this question, I would notice that “Ignorance of Chewbacca” has been going up in a slow but steady fashion over the last few years. Furthermore, my small and caveat laden sample of data currently suggests that at least 5% of the world has no clue what this Chewbacca thing is .
Then, of course, things would get strange. Because usually at this point, I might ask those knowledgeable in the audience, to describe “Chewbacca” to those who are not. Here, the references to Star Wars specifically and science fiction in general come out. This includes discussions about co-piloting space ships, ripping arms off, and descriptions of a weapon that is a cross between a laser and a crossbow. The word “wookie” will inevitably surface, and then, remarkably you might say, someone will begin to make Chewbacca sounds – something best described as a long vibrating groan suggestive of yearning . Indeed, if I give it a chance, the whole lecture hall might even begin making Chewbacca sounds, which is something that is both uniformly glorious and bizarre at the same time. Interestingly, none of this really seems to help the 5% who confessed to being Chewbacca ignorant. If anything, the 5%, looking at the strange proceedings around them, tend to look confused if not a little frightened.
I bring this up, because this silly idea of Chewbacca ignorance is a bit like asking people, “What is science?” It’s one of those things where a proper answer is actually very rich in detail, and nuanced in ways that can be surprising. Furthermore, these details and nuances tend to be only obvious to those firmly embedded within science culture itself. And much like the Chewbacca example, if you explain this to a person who is not part of this culture, it would probably sound a little bewildering and frightening too.
To illustrate this, let’s try something right now. Find someone you know who isn’t into science.
This is probably pretty easy, since this is likely most people. Now ask them point blank, “What is science?” Undoubtedly, you will get all manner of responses – many of which will reference graphs, measurements and technology, perhaps with nods to things like physics, chemistry and biology. But if you listen carefully, I would bet that the responses are vague at best, and certainly not a reflection of the richness involved in what I consider a proper answer. Sort of like the injustice that goes with describing Chewbacca as simply, “a character in a science fiction movie.”
To me, this is a shame. Not the Chewbacca part (which is a different kind of shame), but the bit about science. To me, the idea of the general public reacting to the fundamentals of science literacy, in a way that the aforementioned 5% might react to a wookie sound, is a very bad thing. In fact, I would suggest that this confusion or lack of familiarity over science is actually a dangerous thing. This is because, unlike wookies, science has an increasingly active and prominent role in real life.
As well, this lack of clarity is not about science literacy in the sense that we worry about citizens who do not know about greenhouse gases, or how DNA is replicated, or how differential calculus is done – in other words, it’s not really about specific technical details (although this is important too). But rather, it is mostly about whether a person is literate of the process; whether they appreciate the steps and parameters which define how science is done. It is mostly about these points because they represent a framework that provides the world with a very powerful way of knowing things (epistemology for those who prefer big words).
Such parameters, of course, are often neatly laid out in what many would call “The Scientific Method.” Almost everyone will hear about this at some point in their lives, although it appears to be a topic that mostly presents itself at younger ages, at the elementary school levels for instance. However, one also finds that as the student gets older, its premise will be continually diluted by an increasing glut of science technical detail. This is an unfortunate reality of how science is taught in schools – there are information hierarchies that must be covered in order to get to the next level, and because the volume of that information is intense, there is simply little time for students to reexamine the basic principles of the scientific method and of science culture itself. Furthermore, this does not even include those young students who decide to avoid the sciences altogether.
Which brings us back to aforementioned mention of shame. After all, shouldn’t we encourage all students and citizens to continually reassess the scientific method: more so, since an elementary student is hardly in the best position to fully appreciate its complexity? Isn’t the scientific method an icon of rationality – something that you hope all decision makers, from individuals making small choices to leaders making large ones, would take time to appreciate fully?
Unfortunately, this isn’t how the world currently works. Which is disappointing: because regardless of all this talk about society and danger and decisions, it would do us well to be reminded that through it all, the Scientific Method (and what it has produced) is, quite frankly, awesome.
So for now, we’ll end this section with something basic. We’ll end it with a flowchart depicting the scientific method. Perhaps something with steps like the below:
1. See something.
2. Think of a reason why.
3. Figure out a way to check your reason.
5. Now, everyone gets to dump on you.
6. Repeat, until a consensus is formed.
But don’t forget: this representation is, by no means, a complete picture or even necessarily a correct picture. Indeed, Sir Francis Bacon himself, a man often considered to be the “Father of Scientific Method,”  may disapprove with the simplicity of this flowchart.
It is, however, as good a place to start as any: and hopefully sufficient to at least utter the sentiment, “Punch it Chewie.”
 If you happen to be part of this 5%, please refer to this link for more on Chewbacca.
 The Chewbacca Soundboard.
 Sir Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626) was incredibly influential in highlighting the importance of “inductive reasoning” through the accumulation of data (also sometimes called the Baconian Method). he was also buddies with the British Monarchy, and there exists many a hypotheses that suggests he may have written some of the works of Shakespeare.
Looking forward to the rest! [makes Chewbacca noise]
[…] 01 An Introduction to the Scientific Method, by way of Chewbacca. […]
I’m glad you put that stuff about how the flowchart is a simplification. Would’ve had a problem otherwise, although admittedly, you had me at “wookie.” Will keep reading!
[…] when I did my usual “must somehow reference Chewbacca” shtick (this is an ongoing tradition I have for all my public talks). Right from my introductory remarks, I could tell the audience was […]
Thanks for the post. What a fun way to introduce a topic!
Will keep my eyes out for more!
I am paying “blog calls” to each @scio12 attendee to say “Hi” and give your blog a shoutout on twitter (I’m @sciencegoddess). I look forward to meeting you in January!
[…] as a low res pdf or high res pdf handout, or start here for web reading. Share this:TwitterFacebookPinterestRedditLike this:LikeBe the first to like this […]
[…] I’ve been doing a little writing on the philosophy of science, and a consequence of this, is my mind pondering the plight of Bacon. Not the food, but rather […]
[…] a little unconventional to say the least (for example, my pieces tend to look like this, this, and this), I have to admit that the whole prospect is scaring the bejeezus out of me. Basically, it would be […]
[…] for good decision making. (Plus, it doesn’t have to be boring either – check out this piece for instance) In other words, it’s not necessarily about educating people to become scientists, […]
I do this because I’m curious on whether there are actually people in this world who have never heard of Chewbacca.To my mind singapore accounting software
As well, this lack of clarity is not about science literacy in the sense that we worry about citizens who do not know about greenhouse gases, or how DNA is replicated, or how differential calculus is done – in other words click here to order
As well, this lack of clearly is not about science literacy in that sense that we horrify about the citizens who do not know about greenhouse Freestanding Tablet Holder gases and how DNA is replicated.
A TANGENTIAL SCIENTIFIC METHOD:
ON THE NATURE OF SCIENCE WITH REFERENCES TO CHEWBACCA, STORK EATING ALIENS, A FEW STEVES, ONE INSTANCE OF THE WORD “FUCK,” AND (QUITE POSSIBLY) TWO VERY LARGE CHILDREN.Political messages are probably more valid than those motivated by a search for cheeky laughs (a la 2Day FM) HCG drops
Then, of course, things would get strange. Because usually at this point, I might ask those knowledgeable in the audience, to describe “Chewbacca” to those who are not. Here, the references to Star Wars specifically and science fiction in general come out. This includes discussions about co-piloting space ships, ripping arms off, and descriptions of a weapon that is a cross between a laser and a crossbow. The word “wookie” will inevitably surface george
Its really good for me, this is very informative and useful for those looking for it you can visit our site for more information visit.lisa
Thank you for the information you give is very helpful and we thank you very much need you give us small businesses the opportunity to comment.fethiye rodos feribot
Thanks everyone for your comments, i really appreciate. Hugo, your comment made my day. Knowing that some people appreciate my work means a lot to me. It’s cool to see your interest in the language. Ruby is one wild beast but to me it’s the most interesting and elegant language out there.jasa pembuatan patung fiber
I never really classified myself as such before, but reading this, I understand why, if I’m exhausted, all I want to be is alone, and how I’m extroverted only when I can control my environment and how that’s a THING! If you’re shy or are unsure, this is a great read. I think you’ll discover something about yourself, that’s why I’ve recommended to a lot of people lately!mobile pokies
I’ve been to Gettysburg and New Orleans. I went to New Orleans for work, so I didn’t get a lot of time to sightsee, but I would love to go back. I took a cruise to Bermuda..I wonder how close to the triangle I was….fashion store
Very happy to found here such a unique topic blog. Keep write and share more this kind of blog.
I love your descriptions and photos. I think I would like to wear some of the hats. Corsets and hobble skirts, absolutely not. Some of the looser and flowing dresses, maybe.Limited And Trending
Interesting..i never heard of Chewbacca. Now got to know about it through your article and really good analysis. I am interested in these type of articles, keep writing. I work for Laser Tag
Greetings to each one, it’s really a particular for me to visit this website page, it comprises of helpful Information.Affordable Crystals
Your thing with respect to making will be for all intents and purposes nothing hard to come by of amazing. This instructive article is unimaginably valuable and contains offered myself a superior answer for have the option to my own issues. how much does microblading cost
Great advice. Layering is essential when you live in the mountains. We also try to make sure all of our clothes will go with several different pieces, that way the clothing can be worn more times without seeming the same.nails
This is a fantastic step by step process for successful blogging. Outstanding guide that anyone can benefit from even if you have an established blog. Thanks so much for sharing your wisdom and experience.uv400 sunglasses