.

Tag: physics

1973 analysis suggests that “person on bicycle” equals number one in efficiency for animals and/or machines.

“It is worth asking why such an apparently simple device as the bicycle should have had such a major effect on the acceleration of technology. The answer surely lies in the sheer humanity of the machine. Its purpose is to make it easier for an individual to move about, and this the bicycle achieves in a way that quite outdoes natural evolution.

When one compares the energy consumed in moving a certain distance as a function of body weight for a variety of animals and machines, one finds that an unaided walking man does fairly well (consuming about .75 calorie per gram per kilometer), but he is not as efficient as a horse, a salmon or a jet transport. With the aid of a bicycle, however, the man’s energy consumption for a given distance is reduced to about a fifth (roughly .15 calorie per gram per kilometer).

Therefore, apart from increasing his unaided speed by a factor of three or four, the cyclist improves his efficiency rating to No. 1 among moving creatures and machines.” (S.S. Wilson from Scientific American, March 1973)

(see this link, via futility closet)

That THX theme: “Deep Note,” the score and visual wav file

In case, you don’t know what I’m referring to, check out this link.

“The THX logo theme consists of 30 voices over seven measures, starting in a narrow range, 200 to 400 Hz, and slowly diverting to preselected pitches encompassing three octaves. The 30 voices begin at pitches between 200 Hz and 400 Hz and arrive at pre-selected pitches spanning three octaves by the fourth measure. The highest pitch is slightly detuned while there are double the number of voices of the lowest two pitches.” (From the US Trademark registration).

(via Futility Closet)

Art plus gravity (or lack thereof)

2-9

2-1

4-5

By Pejac, photos by Gary Van Handley. Via Colossal.

Cute (although slightly flawed) animated gif of visible light wavelengths.

wavelength

(Not sure who the original creator is – let me know if anyone finds out). Via Reddit.

Holy crap! It’s a photo of a weasel riding on the back of a woodpecker!

weasel-riding-woodpecker-wildlife-photography-martin-le-may-1

weasel-riding-woodpecker-wildlife-photography-martin-le-may-2

Photo by Martin Le-May (see here for more details) via io9.

Einstein to Curie: “don’t read that hogwash, but rather leave it to the reptile for whom it has been fabricated.” #awesome

In which we see correspondence between Albert Einstein and Marie Curie, essentially telling her that she’s awesome and that she should “ignore the trolls” (or in this case, the “reptiles” – no offence to my herpetologist friends).

einsteintomariecurie

From The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein (Princeton).

A Few Words From the Scientist Who Invented Wonder Women’s Invisible Jet.

By DAVID NG

invisiblejet

First of all, I totally get it. You’re watching Super Friends or reading some Justice League of America comic book, and what do you see? Wonder Woman floating in mid air, in what is apparently an “invisible jet.” And for some reason, the fact that you know that it’s an invisible jet (because someone has gone to the trouble of outlining the jet with white phantom lines), is supposedly meant to make this OK.

Except that it doesn’t. You know this and I know this, and well, everybody knows this. Because the truth is: Wonder Woman looks kind of stupid floating in mid air. I mean, seriously, what is the point of having an invisible jet if the pilot—and a pilot wearing bright sparkly superhero colors—is so… well… visible?

So I get all the hate, I totally do.

But listen: I invented that invisible jet! That invisible jet is my research. It’s my baby.

And the reality is that the invisible jet was never meant to hide the pilot. It was just meant to be invisible on its own. If you don’t believe me, then by all means, look it up—my doctoral dissertation and my research publications are quite clear about this.

Wonder Woman totally got this. Actually, she was pretty amazing about it. She was like, “whoa… invisible jet… that’s pretty cool.” And then I was all like, “Yeah, but you know that it’s only the jet that goes invisible right? You know that you won’t be invisible when you sit inside it, right?” And she was like, “Yeah, I get it, but that’s OK, because well… invisible-freaking-jet!

She basically said that it was totally fine to spend a whole bunch of her money on it because (a), it was a good way to support interesting science, and (b), well… it was just awesome.

Unfortunately, her Super Friends buddies were all idiots about it. They were all like, “Diana… you know we can still see you?” And Superman was prone to flying in a seated position and making steering motions and going, “look at me,.. who am I?” Meanwhile, Batman was all like “my utility belt is way cooler.”

But she knew what was going on. She knew that the reality was this: that the jet is a goddamn SCIENTIFIC MARVEL! Something that should be admired—because ingenuity, years of hard work, and significant research funds was all involved to develop that piece of technology.

Now, do I want to continue my research so that things entering the jet also become invisible? Sure—because that would also be pretty awesome. And maybe, one day, I will work on that research goal, and if I do, Wonder Woman is totally going to get first dibs on that piece of hardware.

Because listen, folks: this is how science works, one small step at a time. It’s not fast (like a speeding bullet), or able to make progress (in single bounds). It’s not about gimmicky quick fixes (like the kind you pack in a utility belt), and it takes serious investment (we’re not all caped billionaires with money for caves and batmobiles). This discovery stuff is slow and incremental, and that my friends, is the honest to goodness Lasso of Truth.

(Originally published at McSweeney’s)

Vortexes: still awesome, and now DIY in your pool. By @thephysicsgirl

This is remarkable for so many different reasons. Definitely worth watching. Definitely worth doing (going to see if I can mimic it in my lab with a large water basin).

By Physics Girl.

Nigel Stanford creates a mesmorising collaboration of science and music. #wow

CYMATICS: Science Vs. Music – Nigel Stanford from Nigel Stanford on Vimeo.

More on Nigel here. Via Colossal (Thanks Ben!)

A brief (scientific) history of weapons. (Also brilliant)

briefhistoryofweapons

briefhistoryofweapons02

briefhistoryofweapons03

briefhistoryofweapons04

briefhistoryofweapons05

briefhistoryofweapons06

briefhistoryofweapons07

briefhistoryofweapons08

briefhistoryofweapons09

By Zach Weinersmith, from Medium.

Joke paper on effect of real versus placebo parachute use whilst jumping out an airplane

To quote:

“As with many interventions intended to prevent ill health, the effectiveness of parachutes has not been subjected to rigorous evaluation by using randomised controlled trials. Advocates of evidence based medicine have criticised the adoption of interventions evaluated by using only observational data. We think that everyone might benefit if the most radical protagonists of evidence based medicine organised and participated in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial of the parachute.”

parachutepaper

Download the pdf here.

Wonderful short video on quantum computers. Great discussion segue on the unknown, on science, and on inspiration.

Video by Google, produced by Lorraine Yurshansky

Camera plus alcohol plus combustion equal whoa

Aurora02

Aurora03

Aurora06

Aurora05

By Fabian Oefner, via Colossal

Whoa. Timelapse movie of snowflake formation. #beautiful

snowtime from Иванов Вячеслав on Vimeo.

By Vyacheslav Ivanov, via Colossal.

On the scientific definition of “nothing” and “negligable” #funny

20140206

From Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal.

Two words to describe world’s tallest water slide – holy crap!

verrukt

And, of course, there’s a video:

Now we need the corresponding physics question to go along with it…

Soon to be opened at the Schlitterbahn Waterpark in Kansas City. Via Instinct Magazine.

Scientific research on the existence of time travellers. #4real

Love this – although disappointing that none were found…

timetravellerpaper

ABSTRACT: Time travel has captured the public imagination for much of the past century, but little has been done to actually search for time travelers. Here, three implementations of Internet searches for time travelers are described, all seeking a prescient mention of information not previously available. The first search covered prescient content placed on the Internet, highlighted by a comprehensive search for specific terms in tweets on Twitter. The second search examined prescient inquiries submitted to a search engine, highlighted by a comprehensive search for specific search terms submitted to a popular astronomy web site. The third search involved a request for a direct Internet communication, either by email or tweet, pre-dating to the time of the inquiry. Given practical verifiability concerns, only time travelers from the future were investigated. No time travelers were discovered. Although these negative results do not disprove time travel, given the great reach of the Internet, this search is perhaps the most comprehensive to date.

By Robert J. Nemiroff and Teresa Wilson. Link to arXiv page.

Testing Galileo’s idea IN SPACE!

This is so awesome…

This comes by way of the Futility Closet, which also outlines a really great thought experiment that convinced Galileo that he was right, and Aristotle was wrong (his was the prevailing theory at the time).

Drawable (is that a word?) electrical circuits. Very cool.

circuitscribe01

The folks over at Urbana-based Electroninks Incorporated just launched a Kickstarter project for a new kind of pen that draws fuctional electronic circuits instantly. Called the Circuit Scribe, the handy little device works like a regular ballpoint pen and releases a non-toxic conductive silver ink that dries instantly.

Kickstarter here. Text via Colossal.

Candy that has been organized according to electromagnetic radiation absorption properties.

Made you look…

sugar-6

sugar-5

sugar-4

sugar-3

sugar-1

sugar-7

 
Photographs by Emily Blincoe, via Colossal.